The summer of 2019
It has been a turbulent
summer for the mayor of Amsterdam, Femke Halsema. In mid-July, the son of the
mayor was arrested for carrying an illegal (fake) weapon and causing a public
nuisance. She may was hoping to get away with the issue, but it turned out to not be the
case. The media delved into the
story.
The question rises how to save your
reputation in a sensitive case like this? Did the mayor and her communication
professionals tackle the problem correctly? What can we learn from them? In this blog, I
will give you more insides on this particular case and will critically reflect
their communication strategy.
![]() |
| Source: Het Parool, 2019 |
What happened?
On the 14th of
August 2019, the tabloid paper De Telegraaf publicized two
articles considering the case of an armed robbery committed by the son of
Amsterdam’s mayor, Femke Halsema. Not only does the newspaper argue that the
son of the mayor committed a crime, but they
also suggest that the mayor wanted to sweep the affair under the rug.
These two articles
triggered a response. Femke Halsema sends an open letter to all
citizens of Amsterdam. The tone of voice is harsh. In the letter, she admits
that her son and friends entered an empty houseboat and carried an illegal fake
gun. Moreover, she confronts De Telegraaf. Not only for publishing
misinformation, but also for condemning an innocent person. The mayor also
argues that there is no evidence for asking the police and the justice to under
wrap the case.
Both, the published
articles and the open letter, led to massive coverage and responses from the
media, citizens and even politicians. But which lessons can we extract from
this case? Did she respond correct or incorrect? What can you do differently
during a crisis and how to save your or your (organizations) reputation?
What did Femke and her team do wrong?
- Slow
response: Only responding one month after the incident led to a critical
approach by De Telegraaf. The golden rule in crisis
communication is to react directly and independently when it comes to
harmful news. Results also
showed a welcoming side effect: If you act actively, you have the power to
frame the issue as media content is often influenced by PR in some way.
- Personalization:
In a sensitive topic like this, it is better to separate the roles. Be a
mayor, no mother. Yes, recent studies showed
that there is a trend to be personal as a politician, but this time, it
turned out to be the wrong approach. Femke Halsema was framed in different
media as a concerned mother rather than a credible mayor.
- Repeating
negative frame: De Telegraaf framed the story by
presenting it like Femke Halsema wanted to keep the case silent. In her
open letter, she repeated the negative ‘under the rug’ frame several
times. Studies have
shown that it is better to not repeat this type of negative wording to
avoid the negative spiral and more importantly, act
responsibly.
What went well?
- Neutral
place: The choice to deal with the matter on neutral territory. The case
is brought to court in Harlem instead of Amsterdam.
- Use the
power of the media: The open letter was well received by other media
platforms, because of the (already) great impact of the Telegraaf articles. Newsworthiness is
one of the most well-known news values which stated that if something that
has been in the news already, this leads to more media
coverage.
What lessons can we learn?
Dear reader, please keep
in mind that a reputation can be easily affected. Please act active and
not passive and never forget the golden rule. If you act actively, you
have the power to offer information yourself to media and the public. You have
the control to frame the issue.
If an issue becomes too
personal, it is better to let someone else speak for you. Don’t
forget that your lawyer can speak for you or let your spokesman take the stance.
Use the power of the media. Once a well-known
media already covers your topic, you should use other media to cover your own
story. Once in you made it into news, it is difficult to get out of the news.
Take the benefits of the media.
Please feel free to add
comments in the text box below.
About Naomi Horstkamp
Naomi Horstkamp is a communication student
from the University of Amsterdam, especially interested in the field of
political communication. Public relations, journalism and sports are her
interests and she loves short bio's.


No comments:
Post a Comment